Jul 06, 2022
Have a question?
We must say that the choice of a software development platform is not a decisive factor in the success of a startup. Persistent implementation, innovativeness, proper timing, and a favorable market situation are much more critical. First and foremost, a startup needs to conduct market research to find its niche and ensure enough software downloads to return the investment.
Still, some platforms may slow down the software development process or impose limitations. Thus, since choosing a platform is a long-term commitment, it’s better to do it carefully. You won’t be able to easily move from one framework to another down the road.
This article compares .Net vs. Ruby on Rails as startups’ top software development choices. You will learn more about their pros and cons to decide which framework is right for you.
Table of Contents
RoR and .NET are robust frameworks and popular platforms for software development. Let’s briefly discuss their story and primary characteristics:
The first beta version of .NET appeared in 2002. This Microsoft technology is compatible with various languages, libraries, and editors that simplify the .NET app development process, such as Visual Basic, F#, and C#. Since .NET supports Windows, Linux, and macOS, it enables you to develop software running on all standard devices.
Even though .NET was associated with enterprise software development for years, the shift to open-source and cloud computing has affected its uses. Now, startups can leverage .NET capabilities to create regular web, mobile, or desktop apps. This way, .NET uses don’t differ from Ruby much.
Ruby on Rails appeared in 2004 as an application web framework written in Ruby. Since it’s a model–view–controller framework, it provides web services, databases, and web pages with a default structure. It also utilizes JSON and XML data transfer web standards and HTML, JS, and CSS for interface-building.
Ruby on Rails is lawfully considered one of the fastest and most convenient frameworks. Yet, even though it’s true, the productivity of .NET-based engineering is just as great. Hence, you should choose between .NET and RoR, relying on a broader range of pros and cons.
Here are the advantages and disadvantages of .NET development that may affect your choice of framework.
Ruby on Rails is renowned for its simple syntax and convenience, but here are some other characteristics you should know.
Read more about NET Core vs. Node.js vs. RoR for App Development
.NET is not better than Ruby on Rails in any way, and vice versa. You will have to analyze your business and tech requirements to decide which option is the most suitable in your particular case. Consider these tips to make the right choice:
If you are still unsure what framework is best for you, contact Leobit for consulting or engineering services. We will analyze your requirements and provide .NET or Ruby engineering services depending on which technology will bring the maximum benefits.
Leobit has substantial experience in building software based on both technologies. We have already assisted with developing a lawyer marketplace, shopping eCommerce platform, gambling solution, real estate platform, and many other RoR/.NET-based projects listed here.
The differences between .NET and Ruby on Rails are not significant enough to say that one framework is more powerful than another. You need to consider the expected performance, project volume, and team size to make the right choice. Yet keep in mind that you won’t be able to switch platforms easily after the project starts. Hence, it might be better to use the assistance of an experienced software development provider like Leobit.
Contact us to get the project estimates.
APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Please select your type of project request and submit the form, or contact us at sales@leobit.com for more information on Leobit's services and technologies.